Which criticism highlights the parliamentary system's departure from the principle of separation of powers?

Ministers are appointed based on expertise rather than political affiliation.

The executive and legislature operate independently.

The cabinet simultaneously leads the executive and legislature, creating fusion of powers.

The President has absolute control over the Prime Minister.

APEDIA

RRB NTPC Graduate Tier 1

2025 • 05 Jun, 2025 • Shift-3

Which criticism highlights the parliamentary system's departure from the principle of separation of powers?

Correct Answer

The cabinet simultaneously leads the executive and legislature, creating fusion of powers.

[Constitutional Theory Context]: The doctrine of 'Separation of Powers', famously championed by Montesquieu, demands a strict firewall dividing the legislature,......

💡 Analysis & Explanation

[Constitutional Theory Context] ▼

The doctrine of 'Separation of Powers', famously championed by Montesquieu, demands a strict firewall dividing the legislature, executive, and judiciary to prevent systemic tyranny.

[Systemic Intersection] ▼

Unlike the rigid US Presidential model, the Westminster Parliamentary system deliberately entwines these branches for administrative efficiency.

[Criticism Identification] ▼

The defining characteristic—and its chief theoretical criticism—is that prime ministers and cabinet ministers are simultaneously elected members of the legislature AND heads of the executive. This overlap destroys the firewall, theoretically concentrating dangerous power within the ruling majority.

Conclusion ▼

This dynamic is formally critiqued as the 'fusion of powers'.

Choose Language

See you soon!

Which criticism highlights the parliamentary system's departure from the principle of separation of powers?